How many times have we heard “you should have bet on the flop”, or “you should have checked, instead of going out”? Many and many more times we will hear of it. It is probably an infinite speech and that perhaps will never succeed in getting everyone to agree.
Usually we talk about betting for value or bluffing, but there are at least 5 other reasons that lead us to bet. These are weak reasons, not always necessarily mistakes or wrong actions but still bets that risk making us win less or make us lose a lot, depending on the case. In short , borderline situations, to be filed to acquire even more awareness of the game.
Never bet for info
The famous saying ” point to understand where I am in the hand ” is the first weak reason in betting. A very recurring phrase, especially among those who are beginners. If the latter folds, will we have obtained useful information? No and we got less chips with our cards .
If we will be called instead? In reality we know that the rival has a hand with which he seems willing to play mmc sgd, so it is questionable: are we in front or behind? Is he setting up a bluff or is he trapping us?
The point of the discussion revolves around one thing only: in the decision to bet the ‘bet for info’ it must never be the main element, but possibly a collateral advantage.
Don’t bet to protect your hand
The first is obviously wrong, the second much more subtle.
In the first case the player tends to increase the value he assigns to his hand or to his point compared to what it actually is. When we overbet just to protect our hand we will only be called by better spots and consequently that’s not what we need to do in a value bet.
And here we go back to the other circumstance, in which “We bet to protect the hand”. Which in reality is not a protection but a bet made precisely to obtain maximum profit . This is the subtle “big” difference between the two actions.
Avoid betting to block a bigger bet
How many times you watch small bettate during a hand, just to discourage rivals to make the bet more extensive ? Lots of them.
The problem with this strategy is twofold . First, we should bet on value when we are ahead of the rival’s calling range . We should therefore bet the optimal amount, usually greater than the size of a blocking bet. Otherwise we shouldn’t bet at all unless we have a profitable bluffing opportunity. We should therefore scale our bet to get sufficient fold equity.
The second problem is that our out of position blocking bet is often obvious to an experienced player . And this exposes us to possible bluffs from oppo, or to escapes, when in reality we have an important point in hand. In short, the idea of blocking must be eliminated from our mental process. Just for value or for bluffing .
Balance ranges, but to make chips
This is probably more common in online play, where hand tracking is more affordable than in live matches . What we must never forget is the importance of often balancing the range of our hands . This does not mean betting to balance : if we want to bluff, we do it because we believe it is the right situation to do so and for nothing else. We bluff to get more chips and not to balance our range of hands.
Do not manipulate your image
The fifth and final point concerns the desire of many players to give a different image of themselves with some bets. It is something that we will pay for in the long run, especially in games with low buyins and stakes. An ideal strategy is that instead of possessing the image we have generated by playing to the maximum of our potential . So we take advantage of our image when the opportunity arises, leaving useless and risky transformations aside.…